I submitted both files to OPUS, and the file from the 4700 will process through OPUS with marginal results, but the file from the 4800 aborts with the "data too noisy or collected in kinematic" error. Judging by the file size, it looks about right for my day in question, so I dropped that file into a TGO project (so I can use the better-than-TBC timeline view), and according to the file properties, the observation day, start time & stop time all coincide w/ actual observation time. The last file has an observation day of 76 instead of 95. When I went to download the 4700, there were no files in the receiver from date of observation. So, I downloaded data, and the file from 4800 looks OK. The idea was to submit the data the file from each receiver to OPUS at least twice (using different CORS each time), review the extended output, hold one of the local stations fixed, process the baseline manually, compare the remaining station to the OPUS result, and if all checked out, run from there. Admittedly, the resulting data is not great, but it was a 3.5hr session, and based on past experience I feel it should be usable enough for what I am working on. The site was more wooded than I had planned, but I set the receivers in the best possibe locations I could find. I ran a single baseline static observation to establish control at a remote site using a Trimble 4700 & 4800. I am having some trouble with a problem dataset and was hoping you guys could provide a little insight!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |